MY DOMINION COMMAND HELP REJECTION LETTER-BUT THEY CARE FOR VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES

Actions

Michael Cole

09/05/2013

To: cgasser@legion.ca

 LETTER TO DOMINION COMMAND REQUESTING HELP

Descrimination Based on Mental Disability. Federal Court Case (T-625-13)

I wrote to Parliament and the Human Right's Commission, reference this issue. I left the names out because they are trying to help. My email was written, as follows:

 I am writing you with the greatest respect. I had contacted my MP years ago and the two weeks he said it            would take him to get back to me, have long passed. This is why I am writing you. I believe you will understand     why.                                                                                                                                                                                                         

                        

In 1999, I had to go through the ADR (Alternate Dispute Resolution) process because a Base Commander was Harassing me. I filed a complaint and he made himself judge. Found himself, surprisingly, NOT GUILTY. After years of following the military grievance system, my file got finally to the CDS(Chief of Defense Staff). He was the only Senior Officer I had come across, since filing my complaint, that actually agreed with me and the fact that, you can not adjudicate yourself. This was all in contravention of the written Orders too.

The" Terms of Settlement" were signed  01 April 1999. No File number on the agreement but the ADR was directed by the CDS and the legal "Terms", were signed for the government of Canada on Behalf of the Queen. Within the "Terms", it refers to the government as: Her Majesty the Queen, Her Officers, servants and agents. No one Canadian mentioned. 

During my military service I was injured severely. Both physically and mentally. I filed for Veteran's benefits sighting this case as part of my claim. VAC denied my claim because DND said that no Harassment Complaint was ever filed and there was no paperwork to substantiate my claim. I had kept my copy thinking something like this might happen. I sent DND a copy of the letter written to me by the CDS and a copy of the, "Terms of Settlement." I applied again for benefits and again, was denied. This time because DND said they (the file and documents) were destroyed as a matter of course and they could not verify my story. I went to BPA (Bureau of Pension Advocates) for help. After 1 year they had done nothing for me. I wrote my own request for a Departmental Review. I finally won my case.

DND still denies having the documents, even though there were letters from the CDS, legal documents signed on behalf of the Queen amongst many hundreds more. I asked VAC to help me force the documents from DND. They stated; it is not in our mandate. They said the only way I could tell DND how unacceptable it was that they lost or destroyed the documents (legal ones too) was to take them to Federal Court. I asked VAC to help me as a diagnosed mentally disabled veteran and their response was; it is not in our mandate. This 3 years of fighting and  suffering hospitalized me due to mental problems and torments me to this day. I lost 3 years of benefits because of this situation. There was no file number on the agreement or CDS letter nor any expiry date because I signed knowing I could use this case for pension reasons as stated in the, "Terms."

I'm diagnosed as permanently mentally disabled. I can no longer pilot, VIP Airbus Aircraft because of this. I took the only step left for myself and filed a case in Federal Court against the Queen for damages. All Officers in Canada swore allegiance to the Queen, not Canada. My "Terms", were signed by a General on behalf of the Queen. This ADR was directed by the second highest ranking Officer in Canada, the CDS. I asked the GG (Governor General our military Commander in Chief) for help and he would not even respond. This is a purely military case, dealing in military law. I have no problems with the PM or the MND. I asked them clear questions and got honest and clear answers. I didn't get the same from the military.

I am now filed in Federal Court (T-625-13). As the Plaintiff and being mentally disabled, I asked the court to appoint me a lawyer since it would bankrupt me to pay the cost and I have already given so much to this country.

Omar Khadr, gets a free lawyer. Terrorists, get free lawyers. Murders get free lawyers. BUT! A law abiding Canadian (multiple war) veteran, is denied. The same pilot that flew the "UNKNOWN SOLDIER", home from France. The Federal Courts response to my request was, to just say NO! plus photo copy and mail me an entire copy of the Federal Court Rules. That's it! ("GOT THE BOOK!")

I thought this was quite a slap in the face. It would be the same as yourself, rolling up to the steps of Federal Court and having asked for a ramp for access, they gave you some bags of concrete, a mixer, shovel and water and said, see you inside. Oh by the way, the trial it is beginning in a few hours. If you can't make it in we will file against you. Unfair to say the least! Discrimination, you bet!

I filed a Human Right's Complaint for DISCRIMINATION on my mental disability. Sir, I hope you now understand my situation as a disabled person yourself. With your assistance, might I request a Ministerial Inquiry into this matter and help with my case at the HRC (Human Right's Commission). Thank you

Respectfully

Captain (R) Michael I. Cole, CD1

http://outskirtspress.com/webpage.php?ISBN=9781432792008

Book: http://outskirtspress.com/bookstore/9781432792008.html

thebobs1@sympatico.ca

VETERANS BLOG: michaelcole9112010.blogspot.com

RESPONSE FROM DOMINION COMMAND REGARDING MY 

REQUEST FOR HELP

• Requesting RCL help with my HRC / Federal Court Cases‏

Actions

Carolyn Gasser

10/05/2013

To: 'Michael Cole'

Cc: Andrea Siew

Good morning Mr. Cole,

The mandate of the RCL is to assist and provide free representation service for Veteran’s with their disability claims to VAC and the VRAB. 

We are unable to assist you with your Federal Court case at the HRC, nor are we able to request a Ministerial Inquiry into this matter. ..............................................................

Regards,

Carolyn

carolyn gasser

Service Officer

Officier d'Entraide

The Royal Canadian Legion

Dominion Command

La Légion royale canadienne

Direction nationale

86 Aird Place, Ottawa, K2L 0A1
613-591-3335 ext 231

Toll free: 1-877-534-4666 (1-877-LEGION6)
Fax: 613-591-9335

cgasser@legion.ca - www.Legion.ca

We care for all veterans of all ages and their families /
Les Anciens combattants nous tiennent à coeur, quel que soit leur âge.

WE CARE BUT DON'T HELP, WHEN IT COUNTS!

CANADIAN OFFICER TAKES QUEEN TO FEDERAL COURT

QUESTION: IS FEDERAL COURT FEDERAL? HRC SAYS- NO!

FROM: HRC

 TO: HRC

FROM: FEDERAL COURT

TO: FEDERAL COURT

Clarity!

Lately there have been some confusing questions thrown at the Government. A perfect example of a complex and easily confused question might be:  WHERE DO YOU LIVE?

I find looking for the key words in a question, a good guide on how one might answer complex questions similar to the one above. True story! You can't make this shit up.

DOCUMENT LINK UNDER THE OWL

HRC DOCUMENTS

A Federal Department (Human Rights Comm) (HRC) indicated in their reply letter to me, that they only have jurisdiction over Federal Departments. That makes sense, right? When I wrote to the HRC about a problem I am having with the Federal Court, which is under the jurisdiction of the Federal Justice Department, they indicated that they could not get involved. Why you ask? My complaint, they said, didn't deal with a Federal Department or Agency. The HRC only deals with them!

The key to this whole tricky linguistic situation was the multiple use of the term; Federal. I think there were too many references to Federal Departments that the person got somehow lost and decided none of them could be Federal regardless if they were called Federal.

So there you have it. Denied due to the fact that the Federal Justice Department and the Federal Court are not Federal and therefore since HRC only deals with Federal Departments, I can't get help.

I'm not sure who needs more help in this one. I think my Owl says it all.

The Proof

Click on Link below this picture.

LINK TO: COURT DOCUMENTS

Questioning Dominion Command

Thank you for your submission.

Below is what you submitted to info@legion.ca on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 11:12:40

---

Topic: Addressing Veterans Issues
Name: Captain (Ret'd) Michael Cole, CD1
Address: 158 MacLellan Ave
City: Trenton
Province: ON
Postal: K8V 5H9

Question or Comment: I am a current member of the Legion. I wish to continue being a member but, I have questions. My questions are simple and clear. They will help me understand and decide whether to continue my membership or not. Questions:

1. There are a number of legal challenges of the New Veterans Charter. How has the Legion assisted financially or otherwise?
2. Do you support a Veterans compensation package that is different from your own?
3. What is the Legion actively doing to assist Veterans with the cumbersome process involved in dealing with Veterans Affairs?
4. Will the Legion retain lawyers for Veterans having compensation issues?
5. Does the Legion actively support the return to the, "One Veteran One Standard,"position currently being touted by the Canadian Veterans Advocacy?

Myself and many other Veterans, look forward to the clarity of you answers.

Respectfully,
Captain (Ret'd) Michael Cole, CD1

---

Choose a Future!

Sorry, but I have to talk about one of the most boring topics, logistics. Nothing gets done without proper logistics.

I was thinking about finances available to us. The RCL has lots. VAC has lots if we got our own lawyers and got rid of BPA. Family resources has a bunch too.

If we want to control our own destiny and start fixing the system, we need to tap into resources. As Veterans we are entitled to these funds and we need to go after them. Once we have a sound cash base, we can get to the business at hand and that is getting much needed changes to the New Vets Charter made.

We will have to select a political party. One that will support our ambitions. We use our voting and man power to get them elected and we are on our way.

The RCL is going down and with it the property and finances they have gathered. I'm thinking a handover of Command to the new Veterans is in order.

The Government loves it now because we have hundreds of little groups with no central organizational structure. This is not rocket science. So far they have been doing pretty good on the divide and conquer side.

Please, consider the idea of forming one group out of the many so that we can speak with one voice. It is all up to us.

It is time to be loud and proud. Not silent and compliant. We tried it their way. Why don't we take over steering this boat so it goes in the direction we as citizens and Veterans want.

Your ideas on this would be great to hear.

Your Response - You'll Need It!

Being as tomorrow is Monday, I think it is time to review the appropriate response to any questions that deal with taking responsibility.

I have flown, listened to and studied Senior Officers and Politicians. I have boiled down the response given, when not wanting to answer a question or, take responsibility. They are:

Given to me - "The Warrior Owl"

"LET'S TAKE A LOOK"!

1. Show Concern!

2. Act Surprised!

3. Admit Nothing!

4. Deny Everything!

5. Don't Come First!

6. Don't Come Last!

              &

7. Don't Volunteer!

An example.

 To be used starting Monday:

 What happened with the money?

My goodness, that is a lot of money. I have no idea what happened. I certainly had nothing to do with it. If I hear anything, I will get back to you soonest. If I could help you, I would.

Sound about right? Follows the 7 rules above, exactly.

Let us wait for tomorrow. I am sure you will hear a lot of this.

As Ray Charles would says: "Didn't see you, didn't see me, I didn't see a thing!

Governor General and Senators Seen Here!

These individuals were seen here purchasing items. When asked what they were buying they said that that was a

Government Secret

As a mentally disabled Veteran, it is a sad day when someone like me has to say to the Government!

LET'S HAVE A LOOK!

Now there are only, umm, give me a second to count. Oh ya! there are only ZERO good reasons to investigate yourself.

LET'S HAVE A LOOK!!!!!!!!

Let us look at some recent examples of self investigation:

1. The Church - Sex and other abuse covered-up, for years.

2. The Military - Bad numbers for purchases. Lost Records. Covering for others wrong doing.

3. The Police - Always been a problem. Multiple court cases.

4. The Government - Spending and the care free way they use taxpayers money. Lose a billion here and there, no problem. The poor Auditor General

It is 2013. Wake up. The days of honour are sadly behind us. It has been proven over and over again. If an organization investigates itself, there will be cover-ups. It is why we need courts, justice systems and investigators.

Senators can't be trusted. Mike Duffy and crew covered that nicely. Mike, did so well at it, that the government too, is changing stories to fit the current days situation. His buddy that gave him $90,000.00 got the boot but Duffy is not going anywhere. Now there is a good friend. You lend me money. I get caught. You loose your job. I still keep mine with all the perks I can squeeze out of the taxpayers. There is some honourable Senatorial work for you.

While I am on the subject of honour. Where is our Queen's Representative. Our Commander in Chief.

NEWS FLASH - ANOTHER GG SIGHTING (CLASSIFIED) CODE NAME: WALMART GREETER

The law and order, the tough on crime party. The Conservatives have lost their shot at credibility. The military and church have got the corner on cover-ups. Theirs are just whoppers, but, got to give them credit. They do try and still try to cover it up. I still do not know why. It is so obviously wrong. We know it. They know it. But they still try.

News flash........most of us are now educated. We do our own banking and everything. We have kids, homes and responsibilities  If we get accused of something, we can't call Bob the neighbour in to clear our name. No sir, we have to go to court.

It is not our first Rodeo. Our rules are okay with us because they work. Your self investigative work does not. The Quebec Public Inquiry is proving that.

IT IS OUR COUNTRY - YOU ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO US! 

YOU HAVE LOST IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION. 

BRING YOUR EVIDENCE TO US AND WE WILL DO, 

A PUBLIC INQUIRY!! 

A Sad Story!

This article could be called a massacree!

It could be called a movement!

I think we should call it the entire massacree movement! - Arlo Gutherie would be proud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m57gzA2JCcM

I have been holding out on this true story till now. I believe that it demonstrates the two tiered justice system we have come to know and hate with this government. On one hand, Mr. Harper says he is for getting tough on criminals. Let us now do a comparison on them verses us on the Justice Meter:

WE ARE PAYING ATTENTION NOW!

The Justice Meter

Me

I, as the Aircraft Commander, was flying multiple, back to back, night Search and Rescue missions in my CC 130 Hercules. We were out three consecutive nights, saving lives. When I returned to base the Messes were closed and the only place open was my favorite pizza joint. I called from the Squadron and ordered my pizza, on these three nights. Since our aircraft carries no meals, after multiple hours of hard flying, you land hungry  Because of this fact, DND would cover a small amount of money so you could eat something before going home. I did and there in lies the problem.

I was exhausted. I ate my little pizzas on these nights and was so tired, I forgot to take the receipt off the box and hand it in for payment. As an honest guy I went to the pizza guy, told him what I had done and he gave the 3 replacement receipts. All very legal and legitimate.

I got a call about a month later from the Military Police. They were launching a full investigation into my receipt claim because they were sure they were fraudulent. True to their word, they sent over a Cop to get my statement. I explained the circumstances to the Cop but he was still sure I was a fraud over 3 pizzas.

Now to put this in context, my aircraft which I was commanding was worth over 30 million dollars. I have blank signed government cheques and credit cards with no limits so that I might purchase fuel, accommodations for the crew or repairs while on the road.

The Cop was so sure of his thoughts on fraud, he demanded we go see the pizza guy and interrogate him. I was not allowed to be present since I might influence the pizza guys story. My story was exactly the same as the pizza guys story and as a summation to the Cops report he stated," We could not disprove his claim!" Isn't that a kick in the chops.

Next time I started the aircraft, I let it sit and warm up a while thinking about how much it costs for the fuel flowing through my 4 jet engines vise the cost of 3 pizzas and the audacity it took for the Senior Officers to think, I might stoop so low as to claim pizzas I did not get.

The Government

Well now that you understand justice for an honest aircraft commander. Let us look at the justice for an Honorable Senator. He claims expenses for living one place that he actually does not. He got money, $90,000.00 for it. He got a cheque, with strings attached (PM's lawyer written), from the PM's Chief of Staff. No police. No documentation. No investigation by outsiders.

So to RE-CAP: 

Mike Duffy's pizzas (SO TO SPEAK) were $90,000.00 claimed / paid by me the taxpayer. Refunded to me by the PM's Chief of Staff who needed a legal agreement for his friends loan / gift.

Me, an Officer, Captain, Aircraft Commander claim 3 pizzas totaling no more than $40.00, am fully investigated. Interrogated.  Driven to the QUOTE; SEEN OF THE CRIME, UNQUOTE by the police. They held the pizza owner for questioning. Final results were: I could answer one of the most challenging of all questions........Where do you live? and they: could not disprove my claim that everything I stated was true.

What was that law they brought in saying citizens could make an arrest and hold someone for the police if: theft was involved. My tax dollars are real money and if taken fraudulently, should be dealt with by the police.

THE GRAY AREA

"Into the Weeds"

It Might Be Time!

We as Veterans, have in most part, been patient, law abiding, system following protesters.

We as a group, must be the best mannered protesters ever. No one wants to upset the police or the calm on the hill but, there comes a time where actions are louder than words.

There are the old Veterans. There are the new Veterans. I think that this living document called, "The New Veterans Charter" is not making the grade. I think it is time we get together, ALL OF THE VETERANS TOGETHER, and tell them on the hill.

The Trough!

 Nigel quit. Duffy is calling the RCMP from his cottage in PEI to get rid of

 journalists. Wallin still hangin' in there. Our government misplaces billions of 

tax dollars. They under estimate by millions on purchases of Jets and the  

public should feel no anger or bitterness. What happened to morality as these 

people approach the trough? Does the trough hypnotize them into believing 

WE ARE WATCHING!

they are now God like and untouchable? Some may say that it is a wonderful 

compound and great for growing things. I still call it what it is.......SHIT!

 

I remember when, a long time ago,

that if you didn't know where you lived, you

would be going for a pschyc exam not heading to the Senate

 for more money. 

1. I remember, a long time ago, that when you claimed something that you 

were not entitled to receive, and got money for it, that was called fraud!

2. I remember, a long time ago that when you gave someone money to get out

of a fraud, that was called, being an accomplace! 

That was a different time...... before that temporary tax was brought in for the 

first world war. It is now 2013 not 1918. I just paid my temporary annual tax 

bill again!! I hope I gave the Governor General and Senate enough. If I didn't,

please let me know so I can go out and find another occupation to help cover

their costs. The poor things, we wouldn't want them to starve.  Especially Mike

 Duffy. He looks a little thin these days, don't you think?

UNACCEPTABLE!

I have two distinct and separate cases, plus a Constitutional Challenge. The Federal Court cases are one of lost documents and the hardship on Veterans trying to get benefits from VAC. The second is a Constitutional Challenge on our requirement for swearing allegiance to the Queen and not Canada.

My last issue is dealing with my lawyer request to the Federal Court. With a military caused mental disability, I requested a lawyer be supplied because I am diagnosed, disabled. The Federal Courts response to my disability request was, to send me a book of court rules. Unacceptable!

Accountability - Where?

14 years I have been at this with the Government, with most of it being muzzled by the Orders. You would think that if someone sticks at something for so long, something very bad must have happened.

So far, the Government holds to their story that, all the documents, including the legal ones in my case, were either lost or destroyed.

DIGNITY

What happened was more than bad. It was shameful  It was not in accordance with the Orders. Yup! those pesky Orders. The ones that get pulled out and thrown at you if you just a trooper.  We are certainly held accountable. If you are a Senior rank, the same Orders don't seem to apply the same.

HONESTY

Mike Duffy, a Senator, doesn't even know where he lives. The Chief of Staff gives him $90,000.00 and from his account, doesn't even know him well, from what the news says.

INTEGRITY

I'm taking the military to Federal Court for issues with my misplaced documents and the ramifications of that fact. Being diagnosed with a permanent mental disability, the Federal Court, when asked by me for legal help, sent me a book of Court Rules. This is the same as giving someone in a wheelchair, a bag of cement and a book on how to build a ramp. That would still be a bag of cement more than what I got from the Court.

LOYALTY

My request is now at the Human Right's Commission. They have not contacted me yet. They have 10 days and I am sure they will take all of them.

RESPECT

There is a little known organization in Canada called, the RCMP. Senators are claiming expenses, being charged for offences. The PMO is handing out cheques to cover re-payments and in my situation, the person who contravened Orders was promoted to the second highest rank in the CF with no charges (Oh, did I mention he made himself the judge of his own case?). I on the other hand was never promoted.

I guess us tax paying Veterans are second class citizens compared to the Senior Officers or Politicians. The laws that govern us do not apply to them in the same way. If they did, the Chief of Staff should be cutting me a cheque for $90,000.00 to cover legal costs. You think that is going to happen????

In my case, the government can't cover this one up. I have enough documentation and tapes of interviews to ensure the exact truth, of what really happened, will come out. I am prepared to put it all on the line one more time but, this time instead of in a war zone, it will be for us second class citizens. The little guy. The Veterans. The 99%!

TIME FOR THE REAL STORY!

THE 5 P`s of LIFE!

Proper, Planning, Prevents, Piss, Poor, Performance.

The government explains the Military Chain of Command. I filed my Federal court case and Constitutional challenge is based on what is stated below. The government now does not like what it says here in their publication. I am confused, are you!

The Maple Leaf

October 2012

Commander-in-Chief

Major Carl Gauthier of the Directorate of Honours and Recognition explains, “the Queen

holds Command-in-Chief of Canada; therefore, while modern conventions mean the CF
receives its orders from the government responsible to Parliament, there is a direct chain 
of command from the Queen of Canada, through the Governor General, to the Chief of the Defence Staff.”

x

PICTURES SAY SO MUCH!

I THINK THIS COVERS IT!

EVEN RAY CHARLES CAN SEE THIS ONE!

VETERANS CAN TOO!

PATRIOTISM- It's a long way home!

You don't do this for just pay and pension!

"THE BOOK"

I wrote to Parliament and the Human Right's Commission, reference this issue. I left the names out because they are trying to help. My email was written, as follows:

 I am writing you with the greatest respect. I had contacted my MP years ago and the two weeks he said it would take him to get back to me, have long passed. This is why I am writing you. I believe you will understand why.

In 1999, I had to go through the ADR (Alternate Dispute Resolution) process because a Base Commander was Harassing me. I filed a complaint and he made himself judge. Found himself, surprisingly, NOT GUILTY. After years of following the military grievance system, my file got finally to the CDS(Chief of Defense Staff). He was the only Senior Officer I had come across, since filing my complaint, that actually agreed with me and the fact that, you can not adjudicate yourself. This was all in contravention of the written Orders too.

The" Terms of Settlement" were signed  01 April 1999. No File number on the agreement but the ADR was directed by the CDS and the legal "Terms", were signed for the government of Canada on Behalf of the Queen. Within the "Terms", it refers to the government as: Her Majesty the Queen, Her Officers, servants and agents. No one Canadian mentioned. 

During my military service I was injured severely. Both physically and mentally. I filed for Veteran's benefits sighting this case as part of my claim. VAC denied my claim because DND said that no Harassment Complaint was ever filed and there was no paperwork to substantiate my claim. I had kept my copy thinking something like this might happen. I sent DND a copy of the letter written to me by the CDS and a copy of the, "Terms of Settlement." I applied again for benefits and again, was denied. This time because DND said they (the file and documents) were destroyed as a matter of course and they could not verify my story. I went to BPA (Bureau of Pension Advocates) for help. After 1 year they had done nothing for me. I wrote my own request for a Departmental Review. I finally won my case.

DND still denies having the documents, even though there were letters from the CDS, legal documents signed on behalf of the Queen amongst many hundreds more. I asked VAC to help me force the documents from DND. They stated; it is not in our mandate. They said the only way I could tell DND how unacceptable it was that they lost or destroyed the documents (legal ones too) was to take them to Federal Court. I asked VAC to help me as a diagnosed mentally disabled veteran and their response was; it is not in our mandate. This 3 years of fighting and  suffering hospitalized me due to mental problems and torments me to this day. I lost 3 years of benefits because of this situation. There was no file number on the agreement or CDS letter nor any expiry date because I signed knowing I could use this case for pension reasons as stated in the, "Terms."

I'm diagnosed as permanently mentally disabled. I can no longer pilot, VIP Airbus Aircraft because of this. I took the only step left for myself and filed a case in Federal Court against the Queen for damages. All Officers in Canada swore allegiance to the Queen, not Canada. My "Terms", were signed by a General on behalf of the Queen. This ADR was directed by the second highest ranking Officer in Canada, the CDS. I asked the GG (Governor General our military Commander in Chief) for help and he would not even respond. This is a purely military case, dealing in military law. I have no problems with the PM or the MND. I asked them clear questions and got honest and clear answers. I didn't get the same from the military.

I am now filed in Federal Court (T-625-13). As the Plaintiff and being mentally disabled, I asked the court to appoint me a lawyer since it would bankrupt me to pay the cost and I have already given so much to this country.

Omar Khadr, gets a free lawyer. Terrorists, get free lawyers. Murders get free lawyers. BUT! A law abiding Canadian (multiple war) veteran, is denied. The same pilot that flew the "UNKNOWN SOLDIER", home from France. The Federal Courts response to my request was, to just say NO! plus photo copy and mail me an entire copy of the Federal Court Rules. That's it! ("GOT THE BOOK!")

I thought this was quite a slap in the face. It would be the same as yourself, rolling up to the steps of Federal Court and having asked for a ramp for access, they gave you some bags of concrete, a mixer, shovel and water and said, see you inside. Oh by the way, the trial it is beginning in a few hours. If you can't make it in we will file against you. Unfair to say the least! Discrimination, you bet!

I filed a Human Right's Complaint for DISCRIMINATION on my mental disability. Sir, I hope you now understand my situation as a disabled person yourself. With your assistance, might I request a Ministerial Inquiry into this matter and help with my case at the HRC (Human Right's Commission). Thank you

Respectfully

Captain (R) Michael I. Cole, CD1

FYNES - QUESTION?

A quote from the magazine, "esprit de corps", from an article written by Michel W. Drapeau & Joshua M. Juneau.

FYNES INQUIRY
"During the course of the MPCC ( Military Police Complaints Commission ) inquiry, it became clear that, at all material times, the CF leadership relied heavily on the wide-scale use of sizeable CF public affairs resourses to protect the brand. In so doing, in our opinion, the CF leadership likely placed their own interest ahead of the public interest contrary to the notions of CF leadership and accountability; perhaps, eroding the credibility of the nation's armed forces in times of crisis.

It begs the questions: Do the Armed Forces need upward of 150 CF public affairs officers? Aren't CF Commanders, not public affairs staff, to be entrusted with keeping the Canadian public properly informed?

"If there is no admission a system is broken, then there is little hope that it will be fixed."

Mentally Disabled Veteran vs Federal Court

The Federal Court and myself will find out how tough Veterans really are. What an 

embarrassment and shame, as a mentally disabled veteran, having to take his own 

government to Court. We will find out!!

How many of your tax dollars do you think it will take to beat me down one more time? 

What a Shame !!