Thursday 25 December 2014
Thursday 18 December 2014
THE DIFFERENCE
Unlike this picture, not all of us have the luxury of choice. Those that serve this Country and defend YOUR RIGHTS, do not enjoy the same Right's themselves.
To serve the best interest's of Canada, some (military, Police) do not have the Right to; Show favoritism to one particular Political Party, participate in civil disobedience, joint a Union. Most importantly, you no longer have the Right to do and say what you want. (Freedom of Association and Freedom of Speech).
To serve the best interest's of Canada, some (military, Police) do not have the Right to; Show favoritism to one particular Political Party, participate in civil disobedience, joint a Union. Most importantly, you no longer have the Right to do and say what you want. (Freedom of Association and Freedom of Speech).
Civilian's HAVE MORALITY, as a Choice !!
Serving Police and Military: DON'T HAVE This as a Choice !!
THEY HAVE : OBEDIENCE
Sunday 7 December 2014
CHRISTMAS TRAVEL & UNSAFE SKYS
Since reporting being Ordered to fly medically unfit over a period of 6 months, I will list the agencies notified of this Flight Safety Incident and their response;
Individuals or Agencies Contacted Response & Actions Taken
1. Commander in Chief of the Canadian Forces Nothing
2. The Prime Minister Forwarded to the MND
3. The Minister of Transport Forwarded to the MND
4. Military Flight Safety Nothing
5. Military Ombudsman Nothing
6. VAC Ombudsman Nothing
7. Whistle Blower (Federal) Nothing
8. DSEI Nothing
9. Civilian Flight Safety Nothing
Most Importantly !!
10. Minister of National Defense Nothing
11. Minister of Veterans Affairs Nothing
Mental Health is not taken seriously at DND & CF, why should FLIGHT SAFETY ??
Individuals or Agencies Contacted Response & Actions Taken
1. Commander in Chief of the Canadian Forces Nothing
2. The Prime Minister Forwarded to the MND
3. The Minister of Transport Forwarded to the MND
4. Military Flight Safety Nothing
5. Military Ombudsman Nothing
6. VAC Ombudsman Nothing
7. Whistle Blower (Federal) Nothing
8. DSEI Nothing
9. Civilian Flight Safety Nothing
Most Importantly !!
10. Minister of National Defense Nothing
11. Minister of Veterans Affairs Nothing
Mental Health is not taken seriously at DND & CF, why should FLIGHT SAFETY ??
Friday 21 November 2014
Friday 7 November 2014
BOOK WRITING TIME
Since I am again waiting for Government responses, it is the best time to complete my book.
I will update all as to how you can purchase my first and now second book.
It will be non-fiction and based on what has been covered on this Blog.
If you liked the Blog you will love the book. Lot's more details will be included.
Till then.
I will update all as to how you can purchase my first and now second book.
It will be non-fiction and based on what has been covered on this Blog.
If you liked the Blog you will love the book. Lot's more details will be included.
Till then.
Wednesday 5 November 2014
REMEMBRANCE DAY SCOREBOARD - 2014 EDITION
Well sport's fans, once again it is time to receive a thank you from Canadians for all we, as Veterans, have done and what we stand for. To honour those fallen and take stock of what truly matters to us as a country.
THINK WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS?
HIND SIGHT IS?
Veteran's know what 11.11.14 is all about. They have lost real limbs. Lost friends. Lost family. They have endured long separations from loved ones. Their injuries are not visible in some cases but are as devastating as external physical injuries.
Pre-Game: The Government Thinks ?
1. Senators and the PMO get free lawyers when under investigation.
1. Senators and the PMO get free lawyers when under investigation.
2. Veterans get free lawyers to fight Veterans Affairs. Their employer. (Sounds fare and unbiased)
3. PTSD, to the Human Rights Commission & DND legal department is NOT a disability even though the Federal Mental Health Department, by definition, says it is.
4. Legal agreements between Veterans and the Gov. of Canada, can be destroyed with no ramifications.
5. Veterans lawyers can only engage the Dept. of Veteran's Affairs and no other Gov. Department. No mandate.
The Vet Waits:
1. Veteran told by ATIP at National Defense that Harassment file and ADR Ordered agreement never happened. - ATIP proven wrong. Veteran produced evidence.
2. Veteran then told by ATIP - File and Documents destroyed IAW protocols.
3. Confirmed by MND MacKay
4. Privacy Comm. says it is okay to destroy legal agreements and files relating to this agreement, that are kept in a separate location by the Gov. only and have no expiry date.
5. HRC and the DND legal Department do not support mentally disabled Veterans trying to clarify the document destruction in Federal Court.
6. DSEI, having all relevant documents is unable to decide whether Ordering a Military Pilot to deploy and fly medically unfit is worth investigating.
7. The CF Ombudsman's Office, having received 242 pages of proof showing the items 1 through 6 listed above are factual, like DSEI, they are unable to decide whether these actions are Ethical or just malicious and wrong. They can't decide whether to have this looked into or not.
Waiting For The Referee's Call
I am now waiting almost a month for the CF Ombudsman's Office to read my evidence aand support me in getting justice or just doing nothing.
The Wayne Gretsky Move
Having lost, destroyed or transported this file and Legal Agreement to another time space continuum, it appears they were not aware of the ADR agreement clause stating that at anytime I can go to the highest ranking Officer who Ordered the ADR. This person would be the CDS.
I am making an appointment today for that.
Already in Overtime, Where we are now
I am just a simple, loyal Veteran asking a simple question. I hope the CDS did not miss Ethics Class in his OJT.
Post Game Report - General Info for now
Military, RCMP Veterans as well as all first responders, would appreciate your support. They are always there when we need them, let us be there for them when they need us.
"WE THE LITTLE PEOPLE,"
CAN EFFECT REAL CHANGE!
YOUR INPUT MATTERS.
Monday 3 November 2014
SAY WHAT YOU MEAN & MEAN WHAT YOU SAY
WHAT I DO
At the beginning of the summer, my wife and I found out that a Veteran, living in BC. was having major difficulties with accommodation and finances.
Once I heard about this Veterans plight, I immediately wired money to them, sent them to an airport hotel so they would be ready for the next mornings flight out to Toronto. I picked them up in Toronto and this Veteran is now living at my home.
What is important to note is that I had never met this person before in my life. I took care of their entire relocation from Vancouver to my home. I am assisting this person financially to this day. I am myself, a disabled Veteran but in better financial circumstances than this person. My duty as a Veteran and Officer, IAW "NO ONE LEFT BEHIND", was to help in anyway I could.
I bought a little house to live in so they never be homeless again. I am assisting them with VAC and the cumbersome lengthy process of applying for benefits.
WHAT THEY DO (DND/CF/VAC)
1. Order me to deploy and fly medically unfit (6 months) until my breakdown (2002).
2. After filing a Harassment complaint in 1997, the CDS had to Order an ADR since the accused Base Commander made himself Judge of his own case. (verdict not guilty - surprise?)
3. With a gag Order on me, I was unable to speak of the Harassment case and I retired with nothing in 2007.
4. I was so devastated that I self medicated with alcohol until on my death bed (10% chance of living)
5. Made it through and applied for VAC benefits.
6. Benefits denied because the files containing medical and Harassment documents were destroyed.
7. The Harassment ADR "TERMS"' had no expiry date.
8. Wanting to take the Government to Federal Court for non-compliance, I requested legal help being now diagnosed with PTSD, Generalized Anxiety and Major Depression.
9. The Human Right's Commission denied my request for legal help as did DND reference my request.
10. The Joint DND/CF legal department told me that I never worked as a military pilot, for DND and would not pass the file to the CF person in the Joint DND/CF legal department.
11. DSEI was contacted reference my situation but stated they would only look into the unfit to fly situation and nothing else. I handed all relevant documents and medical reports to their investigator. Since then (4 months ago) no decision whether they will investigate.
12. The GG, PM, Min of Transport, Defense and Veterans Affairs were notified of this situation and my concerns.
13. From this, only the Min. of Transport responded. It was a kind letter stating the Military Flight Safety is up to the Military to Investigate.
14. So in summary: The Case File containing all documents relating to the ADR and Harassment were destroyed. VAC benefits were delayed for almost 4 years and the DND/CF joint legal Department along with HRC will not assist me getting to Federal Court.
15. The GG, PM, MND, CDS, DND/CF joint legal Department, the JAG nor Provost Marshal has asked to have a full investigation of this whole situation.
16. This would never happen in the US military but it does here.
17. Since National Defense seems unable to Investigate itself in a Timely, Unbiased and fair way, I hope the Minister of Transport, being in charge of Civilian Flight Safety will do their own Investigation through the RCMP, IAW the Aeronautical Act.
LEFT BEHIND WITH NO ASSISTANCE by National Defense.
At the beginning of the summer, my wife and I found out that a Veteran, living in BC. was having major difficulties with accommodation and finances.
Once I heard about this Veterans plight, I immediately wired money to them, sent them to an airport hotel so they would be ready for the next mornings flight out to Toronto. I picked them up in Toronto and this Veteran is now living at my home.
What is important to note is that I had never met this person before in my life. I took care of their entire relocation from Vancouver to my home. I am assisting this person financially to this day. I am myself, a disabled Veteran but in better financial circumstances than this person. My duty as a Veteran and Officer, IAW "NO ONE LEFT BEHIND", was to help in anyway I could.
I bought a little house to live in so they never be homeless again. I am assisting them with VAC and the cumbersome lengthy process of applying for benefits.
WHAT THEY DO (DND/CF/VAC)
1. Order me to deploy and fly medically unfit (6 months) until my breakdown (2002).
2. After filing a Harassment complaint in 1997, the CDS had to Order an ADR since the accused Base Commander made himself Judge of his own case. (verdict not guilty - surprise?)
3. With a gag Order on me, I was unable to speak of the Harassment case and I retired with nothing in 2007.
4. I was so devastated that I self medicated with alcohol until on my death bed (10% chance of living)
5. Made it through and applied for VAC benefits.
6. Benefits denied because the files containing medical and Harassment documents were destroyed.
7. The Harassment ADR "TERMS"' had no expiry date.
8. Wanting to take the Government to Federal Court for non-compliance, I requested legal help being now diagnosed with PTSD, Generalized Anxiety and Major Depression.
9. The Human Right's Commission denied my request for legal help as did DND reference my request.
10. The Joint DND/CF legal department told me that I never worked as a military pilot, for DND and would not pass the file to the CF person in the Joint DND/CF legal department.
11. DSEI was contacted reference my situation but stated they would only look into the unfit to fly situation and nothing else. I handed all relevant documents and medical reports to their investigator. Since then (4 months ago) no decision whether they will investigate.
12. The GG, PM, Min of Transport, Defense and Veterans Affairs were notified of this situation and my concerns.
13. From this, only the Min. of Transport responded. It was a kind letter stating the Military Flight Safety is up to the Military to Investigate.
14. So in summary: The Case File containing all documents relating to the ADR and Harassment were destroyed. VAC benefits were delayed for almost 4 years and the DND/CF joint legal Department along with HRC will not assist me getting to Federal Court.
15. The GG, PM, MND, CDS, DND/CF joint legal Department, the JAG nor Provost Marshal has asked to have a full investigation of this whole situation.
16. This would never happen in the US military but it does here.
17. Since National Defense seems unable to Investigate itself in a Timely, Unbiased and fair way, I hope the Minister of Transport, being in charge of Civilian Flight Safety will do their own Investigation through the RCMP, IAW the Aeronautical Act.
LEFT BEHIND WITH NO ASSISTANCE by National Defense.
Thursday 30 October 2014
DISTINCT SOCIETY or MELTING POT
I believe there is a reason Countries were created. Countries represent people with similar language, beliefs and social structure.
The "Melting pot" was the way new Countries like Canada, were formed. Immigrants came to this land, adopted the best, added the good parts of their heritage and this influx of new ideas, coupled with older ingrained traditions, was called a "Melting pot". The very best from all cultures combining into one great County of proud citizens.
The "Distinct Society" is basically bringing your old homeland and it's beliefs and social structure with you as you immigrate to a better country. This unique system allows the immigrating person to leave their country, without improving that place, and move here to impose your home Countries beliefs and social structure here. This allows the Country accepting immigrants to turn into a microcosm of many Countries and with that, the worlds troubles.
I think a re-look at going back to the "Melting pot", might have merit.
I believe this person has put into words, (on the bumper sticker) what a lot of Canadian's think.
To Link: REX MURPHY - CBC
The "Melting pot" was the way new Countries like Canada, were formed. Immigrants came to this land, adopted the best, added the good parts of their heritage and this influx of new ideas, coupled with older ingrained traditions, was called a "Melting pot". The very best from all cultures combining into one great County of proud citizens.
The "Distinct Society" is basically bringing your old homeland and it's beliefs and social structure with you as you immigrate to a better country. This unique system allows the immigrating person to leave their country, without improving that place, and move here to impose your home Countries beliefs and social structure here. This allows the Country accepting immigrants to turn into a microcosm of many Countries and with that, the worlds troubles.
I think a re-look at going back to the "Melting pot", might have merit.
I believe this person has put into words, (on the bumper sticker) what a lot of Canadian's think.
To Link: REX MURPHY - CBC
Thursday 23 October 2014
WELL "H" (THE NEW VETERANS CHARTER - THE SACRED OBLIGATION) BAD IDEAS?
Well "H", all of your saving money on the backs of those that have defended this Country may not seem like such a good idea at this point.
Our newest Veterans have been treated poorly in comparison to the WW2 and Korean Veterans under the New Veterans Charter (NVC).
Your ongoing court battle against our newest Veterans, denying the Countries Sacred Obligation, further alienates these Veterans.
Do you think they will now rush to defend you? Highly trained retired military personnel are a valuable asset.
Your choices of saving a buck or two on the backs of our new Veterans, MAY NOT HAVE BEEN YOUR BEST DECISION - YA THINK!
Our newest Veterans have been treated poorly in comparison to the WW2 and Korean Veterans under the New Veterans Charter (NVC).
Your ongoing court battle against our newest Veterans, denying the Countries Sacred Obligation, further alienates these Veterans.
Do you think they will now rush to defend you? Highly trained retired military personnel are a valuable asset.
Your choices of saving a buck or two on the backs of our new Veterans, MAY NOT HAVE BEEN YOUR BEST DECISION - YA THINK!
Wednesday 22 October 2014
Wednesday 15 October 2014
LEGION - IF YOU DON"T HELP VET's, WHAT DO YOU DO?
MY DOMINION COMMAND HELP REJECTION LETTER-BUT THEY CARE FOR VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES
LETTER TO DOMINION COMMAND REQUESTING HELP
Descrimination Based on Mental Disability. Federal Court Case (T-625-13)
I wrote to Parliament and the Human Right's Commission, reference this issue. I left the names out because they are trying to help. My email was written, as follows:
OWL
I am writing you with the greatest respect. I had contacted my MP years ago and the two weeks he said it would take him to get back to me, have long passed. This is why I am writing you. I believe you will understand why.
In 1999, I had to go through the ADR (Alternate Dispute Resolution) process because a Base Commander was Harassing me. I filed a complaint and he made himself judge. Found himself, surprisingly, NOT GUILTY. After years of following the military grievance system, my file got finally to the CDS(Chief of Defense Staff). He was the only Senior Officer I had come across, since filing my complaint, that actually agreed with me and the fact that, you can not adjudicate yourself. This was all in contravention of the written Orders too.
The" Terms of Settlement" were signed 01 April 1999. No File number on the agreement but the ADR was directed by the CDS and the legal "Terms", were signed for the government of Canada on Behalf of the Queen. Within the "Terms", it refers to the government as: Her Majesty the Queen, Her Officers, servants and agents. No one Canadian mentioned.
During my military service I was injured severely. Both physically and mentally. I filed for Veteran's benefits sighting this case as part of my claim. VAC denied my claim because DND said that no Harassment Complaint was ever filed and there was no paperwork to substantiate my claim. I had kept my copy thinking something like this might happen. I sent DND a copy of the letter written to me by the CDS and a copy of the, "Terms of Settlement." I applied again for benefits and again, was denied. This time because DND said they (the file and documents) were destroyed as a matter of course and they could not verify my story. I went to BPA (Bureau of Pension Advocates) for help. After 1 year they had done nothing for me. I wrote my own request for a Departmental Review. I finally won my case.
DND still denies having the documents, even though there were letters from the CDS, legal documents signed on behalf of the Queen amongst many hundreds more. I asked VAC to help me force the documents from DND. They stated; it is not in our mandate. They said the only way I could tell DND how unacceptable it was that they lost or destroyed the documents (legal ones too) was to take them to Federal Court. I asked VAC to help me as a diagnosed mentally disabled veteran and their response was; it is not in our mandate. This 3 years of fighting and suffering hospitalized me due to mental problems and torments me to this day. I lost 3 years of benefits because of this situation. There was no file number on the agreement or CDS letter nor any expiry date because I signed knowing I could use this case for pension reasons as stated in the, "Terms."
I'm diagnosed as permanently mentally disabled. I can no longer pilot, VIP Airbus Aircraft because of this. I took the only step left for myself and filed a case in Federal Court against the Queen for damages. All Officers in Canada swore allegiance to the Queen, not Canada. My "Terms", were signed by a General on behalf of the Queen. This ADR was directed by the second highest ranking Officer in Canada, the CDS. I asked the GG (Governor General our military Commander in Chief) for help and he would not even respond. This is a purely military case, dealing in military law. I have no problems with the PM or the MND. I asked them clear questions and got honest and clear answers. I didn't get the same from the military.
I am now filed in Federal Court (T-625-13). As the Plaintiff and being mentally disabled, I asked the court to appoint me a lawyer since it would bankrupt me to pay the cost and I have already given so much to this country.
Omar Khadr, gets a free lawyer. Terrorists, get free lawyers. Murders get free lawyers. BUT! A law abiding Canadian (multiple war) veteran, is denied. The same pilot that flew the "UNKNOWN SOLDIER", home from France. The Federal Courts response to my request was, to just say NO! plus photo copy and mail me an entire copy of the Federal Court Rules. That's it! ("GOT THE BOOK!")
I thought this was quite a slap in the face. It would be the same as yourself, rolling up to the steps of Federal Court and having asked for a ramp for access, they gave you some bags of concrete, a mixer, shovel and water and said, see you inside. Oh by the way, the trial it is beginning in a few hours. If you can't make it in we will file against you. Unfair to say the least! Discrimination, you bet!
I filed a Human Right's Complaint for DISCRIMINATION on my mental disability. Sir, I hope you now understand my situation as a disabled person yourself. With your assistance, might I request a Ministerial Inquiry into this matter and help with my case at the HRC (Human Right's Commission). Thank you
Respectfully
Captain (R) Michael I. Cole, CD1
Book: http://outskirtspress.com/bookstore/9781432792008.html
thebobs1@sympatico.ca
VETERANS BLOG: michaelcole9112010.blogspot.com
RESPONSE FROM DOMINION COMMAND REGARDING MY
REQUEST FOR HELP
HARD COPY
carolyn gasser
Service Officer
Officier d'Entraide
The Royal Canadian Legion
Dominion Command
La Légion royale canadienne
Direction nationale
86 Aird Place, Ottawa, K2L 0A1
613-591-3335 ext 231
613-591-3335 ext 231
Toll free: 1-877-534-4666 (1-877-LEGION6)
Fax: 613-591-9335
Fax: 613-591-9335
We care for all veterans of all ages and their families /
Les Anciens combattants nous tiennent à coeur, quel que soit leur âge.
Les Anciens combattants nous tiennent à coeur, quel que soit leur âge.
WE CARE BUT DON'T HELP, WHEN IT COUNTS!
SORRY A THIRD PARTY HAS ALTERED THIS ENTRY - TRUTH HURTS
Tuesday 7 October 2014
I HOPE THE CF-18 PILOTS ARE MEDICALLY FIT
I hope they don't send unfit pilot's overseas like they did me and Order them to fly too.
Thursday 2 October 2014
Government Responds to Committee on Vet Charter
GOOD POINTS, BAD POINTS and WAY's to IMPROVE (UNANIMOUS REPORT)
These are the three cornerstones on teaching someone a new skill. The problem arises when they say they want to learn but really don't.
A PC member gave a babbling apology to the House and NDP Leader because of his responses to very serious questions regarding our troops being sent to war.
If you want to have something to cry about: Try saying goodbye to your new daughter, your family and a Country who will send you to possibly die but, is not capable of:
These are the three cornerstones on teaching someone a new skill. The problem arises when they say they want to learn but really don't.
A PC member gave a babbling apology to the House and NDP Leader because of his responses to very serious questions regarding our troops being sent to war.
If you want to have something to cry about: Try saying goodbye to your new daughter, your family and a Country who will send you to possibly die but, is not capable of:
"COVERING YOUR 6
GIVING YOU A SACRED OBLIGATION"
As a politician - you must be very proud. The PC's saved a couple of bucks from this guy. This picture must make you so proud of what you are doing. This guy is going to stop genocide and you........? Sleep well.
Wednesday 1 October 2014
Tuesday 30 September 2014
YOUR CHOICE "H"
Billion Dollar Boondoggle by Politicians - No Problems
Sacred Obligation to Soldiers/Veterans - Too Expensive
VERY SAD! VERY WRONG!
Sunday 28 September 2014
THE "H" WORD - Talking Tall With NO Stick
Harper, or as we like to call it, the "H" word, talks kind of like the movie "Walking Tall" but different cause we got nothing. This is why our PM should have military experience or at least be DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the well being of our TROOPS.
See conveniently, we don't have anyone directly responsible/accountable for our TROOPS. We have an elected member of Parliament. He was chosen by other members of Parliament from the same party, to be our Countries leader.
On paper, our Governor General is Commander in Chief............useless. The CDS is a marionette.
"H" talks big but we got nothing. We got busted boats, old airplanes and outdated ground equipment. The Saudi's and Emirate people, the richest on earth, need our help? Why?
If they see a problem then THEY should hire an army. Not overcharge us for fuel and then have us pay to help them. Who is the dog and who is the tail?
Come on "H"! We don't have a Sacred Obligation anymore cause you are fighting it in court. SISIP is not paid out on the court case you lost and you still didn't have the New (2006) Veterans Charter bugs worked out.
You want to send more TROOPS overseas under these solid conditions. Are you kidding me?
These reasons would make me move quickly to the front of the line to go overseas and die. Lot's of backing from the "H" government so far.
You want to send "Somebody" over there to help, You go! You can use all the equipment and support our TROOPS have.
I'll be standing on the ramp by the Hearse with the; Min of Veterans Affairs, CDS and Governor General when you come back. Have your family call 1-866-522-2122 if they ever don't need help.
They are there to take messages, unless it is Friday, when they have phone problems.
See conveniently, we don't have anyone directly responsible/accountable for our TROOPS. We have an elected member of Parliament. He was chosen by other members of Parliament from the same party, to be our Countries leader.
On paper, our Governor General is Commander in Chief............useless. The CDS is a marionette.
"H" talks big but we got nothing. We got busted boats, old airplanes and outdated ground equipment. The Saudi's and Emirate people, the richest on earth, need our help? Why?
If they see a problem then THEY should hire an army. Not overcharge us for fuel and then have us pay to help them. Who is the dog and who is the tail?
Come on "H"! We don't have a Sacred Obligation anymore cause you are fighting it in court. SISIP is not paid out on the court case you lost and you still didn't have the New (2006) Veterans Charter bugs worked out.
You want to send more TROOPS overseas under these solid conditions. Are you kidding me?
These reasons would make me move quickly to the front of the line to go overseas and die. Lot's of backing from the "H" government so far.
You want to send "Somebody" over there to help, You go! You can use all the equipment and support our TROOPS have.
I'll be standing on the ramp by the Hearse with the; Min of Veterans Affairs, CDS and Governor General when you come back. Have your family call 1-866-522-2122 if they ever don't need help.
They are there to take messages, unless it is Friday, when they have phone problems.
Friday 19 September 2014
FAIR UNBIASED INVESTIGATION FROM WITHIN NATIONAL DEFENSE
Communication. An exchange of information both ways would represent ..........FAIR.
Using an outside party with no vested interest would represent ...UNBIASED.
In the civilian world, if someone suggests wrong doing, and they have proof of this, would not unfettered access to the Investigator be appropriate? This would seem FAIR.
Both sides being able to see what the Investigator has found out regarding wrong doing would be FAIR and UNBIASED.
In my two claims of wrong doing under the "whistle-blower legislation", I have not even received confirmation of a formal investigation into either claim. Keeping a person with severe Anxiety caused in part by the claimed actions, is not FAIR or UNBIASED. It is just crewel.
So far I have had:
1. One interview. I was able to had over direct printed evidence of one claim but not the second.
2. I have been able to explain in person, both claims. I achieved this by demonstrating how this would have happened through printed evidence and other evidence I was not permitted to present.
3. I have been told that the Investigator looking into whether a formal investigation will take place, is not requesting or desiring any documentary evidence of my second claim. Only one of two.
4. I have forwarded some (unsolicited) documents demonstrating a strong possibility of a link between my two claims as I expressed it to the investigator in our face to face meeting.
5. The Investigator was and is not interested in my second claim and stated so. Reason, unknown to me. Very kindly, the Investigator did say, it is not in the mandate given to me.
This feels very UNFAIR and BIASED to me thus far.
My two claims are:
1. Deployed as an Aircraft Commander, medically unfit to fly. (SEE NDA art 107 attached below)
2. Destruction of legal documents and evidence regarding my Harassment claim, where the Senior Officer named within my Formal Complaint made himself Judge at his own trial.
Senior Officers below and above the Rank of Major were aware of this wrong doing but did nothing. An Alternate Dispute Resolution was agreed upon and "Terms Of Settlement" signed. I kept my commitments to this agreement, I claim they did not.
The Judgement Letter written by the CDS, the Terms of Settlement and the entire file was destroyed. This was done as I claim to cover-up what happened and to deny me Veterans Benefits as clearly agreed to in the Settlement as this pertains to document retention, storage and the Pension Act itself.
How can you charge under the "National Defense Act" with "Unclean Hands?"
National Defence Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. N-5)
Wrongful acts in relation to aircraft or aircraft material
107. Every person who
(a) in the use of or in relation to any aircraft or aircraft material, wilfully or negligently or by neglect of or contrary to regulations, orders or instructions, does any act or omits to do anything, which act or omission causes or is likely to cause loss of life or bodily injury to any person,
(b) wilfully or negligently or by neglect of or contrary to regulations, orders or instructions, does any act or omits to do anything, which act or omission results or is likely to result in damage to or destruction or loss of any of Her Majesty’s aircraft or aircraft material or of aircraft or aircraft material of any forces cooperating with Her Majesty’s Forces, or
(c) during a state of war wilfully or negligently causes the sequestration by or under the authority of a neutral state or the destruction in a neutral state of any of Her Majesty’s aircraft or of aircraft of any forces cooperating with Her Majesty’s Forces,
is guilty of an offence and on conviction, if the person acted wilfully, is liable to imprisonment for life or to less punishment and, in any other case, is liable to imprisonment for less than two years or to less punishment.
Federal Courts Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7)
Grounds of review
(4) The Federal Court may grant relief under subsection (3) if it is satisfied that the federal board, commission or other tribunal
(a) acted without jurisdiction, acted beyond its jurisdiction or refused to exercise its jurisdiction;
(b) failed to observe a principle of natural justice, procedural fairness or other procedure that it was required by law to observe;
(c) erred in law in making a decision or an order, whether or not the error appears on the face of the record;
(d) based its decision or order on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it;
(e) acted, or failed to act, by reason of fraud or perjured evidence; or
(f) acted in any other way that was contrary to law.
103.57 - OFFENCES IN RELATION TO DOCUMENTS
(1) Section 125 of the National Defence Act provides:
"125. Every person who
wilfully or negligently makes a false statement or entry in a document made or signed by that person and required for official purposes or who, being aware of the falsity of a statement or entry in a document so required, orders the making or signing thereof,
when signing a document required for official purposes, leaves in blank any material part for which the signature is a voucher, or
with intent to injure any person or with intent to deceive, suppresses, defaces, alters or makes away with any document or file kept, made or issued for any military or departmental purposes,
is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to less punishment."
Using an outside party with no vested interest would represent ...UNBIASED.
In the civilian world, if someone suggests wrong doing, and they have proof of this, would not unfettered access to the Investigator be appropriate? This would seem FAIR.
Both sides being able to see what the Investigator has found out regarding wrong doing would be FAIR and UNBIASED.
In my two claims of wrong doing under the "whistle-blower legislation", I have not even received confirmation of a formal investigation into either claim. Keeping a person with severe Anxiety caused in part by the claimed actions, is not FAIR or UNBIASED. It is just crewel.
So far I have had:
1. One interview. I was able to had over direct printed evidence of one claim but not the second.
2. I have been able to explain in person, both claims. I achieved this by demonstrating how this would have happened through printed evidence and other evidence I was not permitted to present.
3. I have been told that the Investigator looking into whether a formal investigation will take place, is not requesting or desiring any documentary evidence of my second claim. Only one of two.
4. I have forwarded some (unsolicited) documents demonstrating a strong possibility of a link between my two claims as I expressed it to the investigator in our face to face meeting.
5. The Investigator was and is not interested in my second claim and stated so. Reason, unknown to me. Very kindly, the Investigator did say, it is not in the mandate given to me.
This feels very UNFAIR and BIASED to me thus far.
My two claims are:
1. Deployed as an Aircraft Commander, medically unfit to fly. (SEE NDA art 107 attached below)
2. Destruction of legal documents and evidence regarding my Harassment claim, where the Senior Officer named within my Formal Complaint made himself Judge at his own trial.
Senior Officers below and above the Rank of Major were aware of this wrong doing but did nothing. An Alternate Dispute Resolution was agreed upon and "Terms Of Settlement" signed. I kept my commitments to this agreement, I claim they did not.
The Judgement Letter written by the CDS, the Terms of Settlement and the entire file was destroyed. This was done as I claim to cover-up what happened and to deny me Veterans Benefits as clearly agreed to in the Settlement as this pertains to document retention, storage and the Pension Act itself.
How can you charge under the "National Defense Act" with "Unclean Hands?"
National Defence Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. N-5)
Wrongful acts in relation to aircraft or aircraft material
107. Every person who
(a) in the use of or in relation to any aircraft or aircraft material, wilfully or negligently or by neglect of or contrary to regulations, orders or instructions, does any act or omits to do anything, which act or omission causes or is likely to cause loss of life or bodily injury to any person,
(b) wilfully or negligently or by neglect of or contrary to regulations, orders or instructions, does any act or omits to do anything, which act or omission results or is likely to result in damage to or destruction or loss of any of Her Majesty’s aircraft or aircraft material or of aircraft or aircraft material of any forces cooperating with Her Majesty’s Forces, or
(c) during a state of war wilfully or negligently causes the sequestration by or under the authority of a neutral state or the destruction in a neutral state of any of Her Majesty’s aircraft or of aircraft of any forces cooperating with Her Majesty’s Forces,
is guilty of an offence and on conviction, if the person acted wilfully, is liable to imprisonment for life or to less punishment and, in any other case, is liable to imprisonment for less than two years or to less punishment.
Federal Courts Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7)
Grounds of review
(4) The Federal Court may grant relief under subsection (3) if it is satisfied that the federal board, commission or other tribunal
(a) acted without jurisdiction, acted beyond its jurisdiction or refused to exercise its jurisdiction;
(b) failed to observe a principle of natural justice, procedural fairness or other procedure that it was required by law to observe;
(c) erred in law in making a decision or an order, whether or not the error appears on the face of the record;
(d) based its decision or order on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it;
(e) acted, or failed to act, by reason of fraud or perjured evidence; or
(f) acted in any other way that was contrary to law.
103.57 - OFFENCES IN RELATION TO DOCUMENTS
(1) Section 125 of the National Defence Act provides:
"125. Every person who
wilfully or negligently makes a false statement or entry in a document made or signed by that person and required for official purposes or who, being aware of the falsity of a statement or entry in a document so required, orders the making or signing thereof,
when signing a document required for official purposes, leaves in blank any material part for which the signature is a voucher, or
with intent to injure any person or with intent to deceive, suppresses, defaces, alters or makes away with any document or file kept, made or issued for any military or departmental purposes,
is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to less punishment."
THE WORD "SAME" - It's Meaning ....... Very Illusive, To Some
Actual Letter - Names changed to protect the sane.
Hi Very Nice and Helpful VAC Staff Person; I am going to write about a very serious issue with humor. I have to do this because my "I don't believe this!" meter, is off the scale.
Hi Very Nice and Helpful VAC Staff Person; I am going to write about a very serious issue with humor. I have to do this because my "I don't believe this!" meter, is off the scale.
Here goes.
I went to the Specialist doctor with a medication problem. It was not the medicine per say it was my reaction to the method of it's delivery. You see the medicine comes in a gel. It is greasy. It burns my skin. I have mild joint pain from it and takes a long time to dry before I can dress.
I asked the Specialist if there was any other medicine that was the same but had a different delivery system. He said yes. It is not greasy. It is a little harder to apply but dries very fast, it does not burn and I don't have the joint pain. It is the same medicine and gives the same results just, a different manufacturer and delivery system.
THIS IS WHERE IT GET's TRICKY - TRY AND STAY WITH ME NOW!
1. Same Specialist doctor.
2. Same usage.
3. Same cost
4. Same pharmacy
5. Same condition as original medicine was treating
6. Same person requiring medicine
7. Same requirement for the medicine
8. Same Special Authorization Unit (SAU) at VAC that approved the original medicine
9. Same Special Authorization Unit (SAU) at VAC that knows my requirement for this medicine
10. Same Specialist doctor who prescribed the original medicine
11. Same Specialist doctor who prescribed this new medicine as an alternative due to side effects
THE VAC (SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION UNIT) DENIED ME THE REPLACEMENT
Did I happen to mention something about everything is the SAME, except for the delivery system?
I see we are still hiring the top achievers from the school of;" how not to understand and just say, "NO".
No thought or explanation as to why, just ....."NO."
Glad I got that out. Hope it made you smile. Seriously, these are exactly the same medicines with a 1% increase and a different delivery system. The cost saving for VAC, you can sell that point is, ( count it to be sure, but the savings I am proposing to VAC is exactly $1.25)
With that poultry sum, the Special Authorization Unit (SAU) could get a coffee and wake up.
Now the real info you need.
Te 1% DIN: 02200000 NOT on Formulary - Approved
A 2% DIN: 02300000 NOT on Formulary - Denied
Can you please fix this for me? My sense of humor is spent now.
Definition of STRESS: " The mind over-riding the bodies basic desire to choke the living sh $^&% t out of some "A" hole (SAU) that really deserves it!"
|
Thank-you in advance. I am still unsure of what language VAC uses. It obviously does not come in the common sense form you seem to use or understand. Thanks for being a translator. You will have to teach me that type of speak some day. I really do try and make it simple to understand. I really thought the repeated use of the word the same might give them a crumb to follow on that logic trail but....... no luck for me. To them at the VAC SAU, the complexity of my thought patterns coupled with my repeated use of the little known term of "SAME", was far too much and exceedingly complex to grasp. Sorry about that.
They wonder why Veterans with mental disabilities,
don't get better very quick.
Wednesday 17 September 2014
GET THAT 1 CENT CHEQUE MACHINE GOING AGAIN
Well it looks like National Defense will have to fire-up that 1 cent cheque printing machine for the family of the last fallen (Suicide victim) in Petawawa.
I am sure that Ms. Gallant, MP for that area is all over this one. Probably as much as she was when after stating in the House, she would debate anyone about Veterans. I of course called her on it. Even asked Colonel (R) Stogran if he would join me. She is still hiding somewhere all camouflaged up, in Petawawa.
More dead from suicide than killed in action. WELL MP GALLANT?
I guess that is what she refers to as well-being of those that serve Canada. What about those Senior Officers unable to follow written Orders and / or deploy medically unfit pilot's, too? Well-being is what it is called on the Hill now?
Dead soldier gets 1-cent cheque from federal government www.cbc.ca The mother of a Hamilton soldier who committed suicide over two years ago is incensed that the federal government sent her dead son a cheque for one cent just a few days ago.
I am sure that Ms. Gallant, MP for that area is all over this one. Probably as much as she was when after stating in the House, she would debate anyone about Veterans. I of course called her on it. Even asked Colonel (R) Stogran if he would join me. She is still hiding somewhere all camouflaged up, in Petawawa.
More dead from suicide than killed in action. WELL MP GALLANT?
I guess that is what she refers to as well-being of those that serve Canada. What about those Senior Officers unable to follow written Orders and / or deploy medically unfit pilot's, too? Well-being is what it is called on the Hill now?
Dead soldier gets 1-cent cheque from federal government www.cbc.ca The mother of a Hamilton soldier who committed suicide over two years ago is incensed that the federal government sent her dead son a cheque for one cent just a few days ago.
Tuesday 16 September 2014
HANDING DOCUMENTS OVER TO AUTHORITIES
Hi Peter and Ms. Murray (DSEI); Well after 17 years I have done all I can as an Officer. I have to pointed out wrongdoings within the military justice (or lack thereof) system. I have all of the most damning documents compiled by year and have them ready for delivery.
There are many people I have dealt with, who are paid very good wages to properly handle these issues. So far, they have not. I wish to personally hand my documents over to you for proper distribution.
I have contacted every organization I know of for resolution. As an MP / DSEI Investigator, you may have sway or influence for those responsible and have them to do their job, for a change.
My MP Norlock (Conservative) has been as helpful as the Federal Government itself thus far. This is why I am asking you to take these documents so I can discharge myself from any responsibility I have as an Officer of the Queen in doing my duty for our Country.
Please let me know a time and date in the near future when I can see you in person to hand these documents over. That same day I will pass them to Federal Court. I look forward to seeing you soon.
Captain (R) Michael I. Cole, CD1
VETERANS BLOG: michaelcole9112010.blogspot.
Friday 12 September 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)