1. I filed my INITIAL COMPLAINT within 1 year of being denied "Accommodation" at the Federal Court. As of this date (today), Mentally Disabled Veterans are not afforded "Accommodation" (a lawyer) at the Federal Court.
2. The Mentally Disabled Veteran, injured in the line of duty, must choose a lawyer and pay out of their own small pension if they wish to challenge an action made by a Federal Department. (Forced into Bankruptcy)
3. Now a Veteran who has served honourably is considered the enemy to the serving Government if they bring legitimate action against a Federal Department.
4. If however you hold a Federal Job such as a Senator and are suspected of breaking the law, you get a free lawyer paid for by that same Veteran, who honourably served and was denied a lawyer.
Let Us Re-Cap Thus Far
Let's Compare One on One
The Honourably Discharged Veteran The Senator Under RCMP
Investigation
1. If something against Orders happens while 1. Investigations are handled by the
serving, an in house investigation is done. Such as the RCMP.
one started because the media pointed out 5 sex
assaults a day were happening and it seems DND was
unaware.
2. The results favorable or not are made illegal 2. The Senator always has media
to talk about. access and always has, freedom
3. By even filing a complaint the serving member of speech.
could; a. Loose their job. 3. Unless charges are laid, no
b. Have their career progression halted. repercussions or suspended with or
c. Be given the label of trouble maker and without pay.
have your working conditions unbearable.
4. Not being able to speak of a very troubling incident 4. Senator charged or not charged
while serving, the member has to wait til they can based on the evidence only. Public
honourably discharge before accessing information about Records.
ranking personnel who made the decisions.
5. In my case, in contravention to the "Terms of Settlement" 5. Appeals can be launched all the way
all documentation was destroyed except that required to to the Supreme Court.
disprove my Veterans Claim.
6. Privacy Commission ruled in favour of document destruction
and said Federal Court action is last resort.
7. Federal Court denies "Accommodation" (a lawyer) because
that is not done for Veterans who were denied freedom's which they
were protecting.
8. The last recourse for the Veteran is the Federal Human Rights
Commission (HRC).
9. In my case to date:
a. The HRC Staff has never proposed reconciliation
even though this is their required first step.
b. After 1 year at the Early Resolution Department the
Investigator states that they believe my case frivolous,
never having met with me or seen any hard evidence.
10. DND (the Respondent) agrees with the Investigator and boldly
states I never worked for the Department of National Defense
as a Military CC-130 and Airbus pilot for the Prime Minister.
NOW THEY ASK ME TO RESPOND.....TO WHAT EXACTLY?
1. The non-offer of reconcilliation?
2. The non-investigation?
3. The response from DND that I never worked for them so they don't have to respond and didn't?
4. The comment of "FRIVOLOUS COMPLAINT" was even mentioned without ever seeing any evidence or speaking to me?
5. The Investigator accepting DND's response as acceptable not knowing anything about the actual structure of the military?
DO YOU WANT ME TO RESPOND TO THE INTIMIDATION OR ACCUSATIONS OF FILING A FRIVILOUS CLAIM?
Please tell me because I am diagnosed mentally disabled with 4 conditions you have never addressed. I am still waiting for the answers to the same two (2) questions I have been asking from day one (1 year ago)
1. AM I DISABLED? YES or NO?
2. IF MEDICALLY DIAGNOSED AS PERMANENTLY MENTALLY DISABLED, DO I GET ACCOMMODATION?
I am disabled not dumb!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment